Random Thoughts

Barrack Obama has been declared the first Gay President.  I believe Drudge reported this three years ago.

Ron Paul has decided to use his campaign's war chest to maximize his ability to get delegates at the convention.  No doubt this strategy is based on three factors: #1 He has a limited amount of money on hand.   #2 He wants to get the most bang for his buck.  #3 He is unwilling to spend money he doesn't have in order to elevate his personal position of power.  I note that the media has labeled this situation as "withdrawing from the race".  Nothing could be further from the truth.  He is still in it to win it.  He needs a brokered convention to make that happen, or at least a second round of voting to unbind the delegates.  It seems that in America today, fiscal responsibility is viewed as "quitting".  To be fair, no one inside the beltway understands the concept of not spending money you don't have.  This one fact makes Ron Paul the only person running with enough common sense to do the job, while simultaneously making it nearly impossible for him to obtain it.

We have an interesting situation developing in the presidential race.  Short of a upset at the republican convention it seems that Mitt ($50 abortions, communist health care, love that butt sex) Romney will be running against Barrack (love that butt sex, I wish I was a women so I could have an abortion, communist health care) Obama.  Clearly this election is going to be a contest between the evil of two lessors.

If Ron Paul's name fails to appear preprinted on my ballot, I will write him in, just like last time.

All the talk about Obama Care facing serious problems at the Supreme Court is political theater.  I will cheer if the whole mess is thrown out, as it should be, it will never happen.  Kagan, who apparently never heard of judicial ethics, wouldn’t even consider recusing herself from hearing arguments. Only an idiot would think that (lack of) Justice Kagan, who worked for Obama and who drafted the very legal arguments used to defend the bill would vote against her own work product.  Let’s do the math.  The Supreme court has nine justices.  Four are confirmed communist nut jobs who hate America, two are RINO’s and one could go either way.  As I see it that’s 6 or maybe 7 votes in favor of Obama care, a clear majority.  Maybe, and I say maybe, 2 justices still have the smallest shred of remembrance and concern for the constitution, that’s still 5 to 4 and Obama wins.  The first ladies “confidential” news leak regarding her concern that B.O. will see himself as a “loser” if Obama (lack of) Care isn’t ratified, is mere propaganda.  Don’t worry Michelle, your husband is still a loser. So are the rest of us now thanks to Obama Care.  It’s going to stand and the economy is going to fall, even farther.